ESB — integrations between applications

It is long and expensive to add new systems to the IT circuit

as a result, the company has fewer innovations. You can't choose the best solution because you're limited by time, or the stack, or the instability of integrations.

The development team is not engaged in development, but in “extinguishing fires”.

Investigating the causes of the failure requires a highly qualified developer and is not delegated to technical support operators. Developers are burning out, but there are no new values.

The architecture has a single point of failure.

When one system fails, another (or several at once) “crashes”.

We have to choose situational solutions rather than build the right architecture

It's hard to do something new and right; you'll have to hand it all over, which is time-consuming, expensive and unpredictable.

Information in systems is inconsistent

In end systems, data is of poor quality and contradictory, and it is difficult to work with suppliers and buyers.

Integrations are inseparable from the product

To fix the integration, you always need a developer for this product. You can't replace the system at will — this triggers a cascade of problems.

Endpoint systems are forced to process redundant data

You have a “universal package” that contains all product data. CRM processes inventory every time, WMS processes media files, etc. The systems are overloaded.