We configure EDI in 1C for document preparation, approval, signing, and delivery, while checking authority and monitoring receipts and exceptions.
Our clients
We configure the processing of UPDs, acts, and other documents in 1C, from preparation to the operator's receipt. Automated actions follow approved rules; disputed documents are assigned to the responsible person.
Preparation
Verification
Signing
Sending
Result
| Area | What needs to be determined | When an employee is required |
|---|---|---|
| Document | Type, format, details, amount, and counterparty | Data discrepancy or non-standard document |
| Authorities | Who signs, which certificate is used, and whether an MChD is required | No valid authority, or the certificate has been revoked |
| Approval | Which documents proceed without additional decisions | The amount or terms fall outside the approved rule |
| Exchange | Package identifier, receipts, and duplicate handling | Operator rejection, format error, or no response |
We save the rejection reason and a link to the document. The responsible employee corrects the data, after which the package is validated again.
We check the package status with the operator. We resend it with duplicate protection and an activity log.
We suspend signing; an authorized employee checks the certificate and authorities. Signing keys are not provided to the language model.
The 1C version and customizations, operator, document types, volume, and current manual actions.
Approval workflows, signatory authority, key storage, roles, and exception handling.
A typical document, rejection, resend, operator unavailability, and certificate change.
We accept the work against agreed metrics. We provide the settings, error log, instructions, and update procedure.
The estimate depends on the 1C configuration and customizations, the selected operator, the number of document types, approval routes, and available interfaces. We first check the standard capabilities of 1C and the operator, and customize only the missing logic.
AI can be connected for recognition and exception analysis through agent for 1C. Legally binding signing remains within the approved workflow.
If you are just getting familiar with the topic, start with the overview what 1C EDI is and how electronic document exchange works: terms, exchange flow, operator comparison, and step-by-step setup. We have separate solutions for specific EDI operators: signing and sending via Diadoc, data exchange and reporting via SBIS, reporting and EDI via Taxcom.
If the task goes beyond document exchange, see full document workflow automation or Diadoc integration with enterprise systems through APIs.
FAQ
This depends on the 1C configuration, signing mechanism, and signatory's authorities. Before launch, we verify applicability to the selected documents and establish the rules with those responsible for document workflow and information security.
We account for the requirements of 63-FZ on electronic signatures, the signatory's authorities, applicable formats, and the operator's exchange rules. A single certificate or transport channel does not replace verification of these conditions.
No. Discontinuing certain electronic act and waybill formats does not prohibit paper source documents or non-standardized electronic documents. Formalized electronic exchange uses the current UPD 5.03 format; the scenario depends on the document and the parties' requirements.
We first check the available modules and interfaces of the current operator — Diadoc, SBIS/Saby, or Taxcom. Connection costs, roaming, and limitations depend on the operator.
The document is assigned an exception reason and an owner. Corrections and resubmission are recorded in the log; sensitive actions are performed after the required approval.
News
The FNS Commission (Decision No. 936-039 dated April 3, 2026) confirmed Taxcom’s compliance with requirements for EDI operators and extended its status until April 3, 2028; the service supports roaming with 33 operators.
Cases
Testimonials
The KT.Team team is a mature development partner. The delivery process is very clearly organized, and the smooth collaboration within the engineering team deserves special mention. When the team sees that the development process needs fine-tuning, it does it. During discussions, the team digs into the essence of the tasks and seeks to understand the business context. The work is aimed not at formally fulfilling the specification but at solving the real problem. Thanks to strong engineering expertise and product thinking, the team can be trusted not only with implementation but also with the architecture of the entire system.
The Muztorg group of companies has been working successfully with the KT.Team team for more than two years. The high professionalism of our partners helps us a great deal, as does their ability to combine well-structured project management with minimal formal constraints. I would especially like to note the friendliness and openness of the KT.Team staff.
The best — both the developers and the management, and the owners are in a league of their own! What was done at Snow Queen would have taken other companies 10 times longer. And thank you for assessing development sensibly and not stretching out the timelines.
You set a high standard for working with contractors. After you, dealing with others leaves a feeling of falling short of expectations.
After several years of joint, productive work, I want to thank our colleagues at KT.Team. Together we have come a long way, solved thousands of tasks, survived 3 Black Fridays already, and developed and successfully launched several large projects estimated at more than 2,000 person-hours. Both I and the company's management are pleased with our collaboration.
Before KT we had another contractor — a large, well-known integrator — and every change was expensive and painful. We even considered abandoning Magento altogether! kt.team took on a huge amount of work. A great team!
Show us a typical document, an example error, your 1C configuration, and EDI operator. We will identify what standard mechanisms cover, where customizations are needed, and how to measure the reduction in manual work.
Discuss EDI automationVerification date: 15.09.2026
