Extraction accuracy
Proportion of fields correctly transferred from proposals to a unified structure.
AI
AI assistant that extracts terms from commercial proposals, compares suppliers by procurement rules, and prepares verified summaries.
Our clients
The assistant retrieves commercial proposals from an agreed-upon channel: email, form, file storage, or procurement system.
The model populates a unified structure: item master, price, delivery term, payment, warranty, and other procurement fields.
Each proposal is matched against specifications, thresholds, and mandatory conditions.
System calculates scores using approved methodology and separately shows missing data and deviations
The commission receives a summary, links to source documents, and a list of questions for suppliers.
After verification, data and documents can be returned to 1C, SAP, Directum, SBIS, or another target system.
| System / layer | Scope of responsibility |
|---|---|
| Channels and storage | Receiving original proposals and preserving the unchanged original. |
| Extraction module | Field recognition and binding each value to its source |
| Procurement rules | Comparison criteria, weights, thresholds, and mandatory conditions. |
| Procurement commission | Exception verification, clarification requests, and final supplier selection. |
| ERP or DMS | Tracking approved decision, documents, and subsequent operations |
First measure the current process, then compare the assistant against the same control sample
Proportion of fields correctly transferred from proposals to a unified structure.
Proportion of known specification mismatches found by the assistant.
How many values and conclusions the expert changed before the committee's decision
Time from receiving a complete set of commercial proposals to a verified comparative summary.
Pilot
We take an anonymized sample of proposals, align on fields and criteria, compare results against expert markup, and show the rate of manual corrections.