AI assistant for tender participation

The tender team spends most of its time not on preparing bids, but on sifting through platforms: out of hundreds of published procurements, only a few are relevant, and to know that, each one has to be opened.

The agent handles exactly this step. It screens procurements by your criteria - OKPD, region, volume, customer, experience requirements - filters out clearly non-qualifying ones, and leaves a short list. For each item, it analyzes the technical requirements and pulls out the decision points: scope, deadlines, security, penalty terms, and participant requirements. It then prepares an evaluation draft that a specialist reviews instead of creating from scratch.

This is not a subscription service or another platform. The agent works on your criteria and within your environment: participation history, cost structure, and production load stay inside the company. For public procurement, the logic is the same; only the set of checks and data sources differs.

The impact is measured in hours spent on screening and in the share of bids that make it to submission:

• if the team used to review hundreds of procurements manually
• time for initial screening drops dramatically
• and decisions are made using the same criteria
• for the wrong reason
• who managed to read what

The assistant does not "search for tenders on the internet" - it works from the source list you approve at the start. Public procurement under 44-FZ and state-owned company procurement under 223-FZ is published in the unified procurement information system (zakupki.gov.ru), electronic procedures run on federal e-trading platforms, and commercial procurement lives on customer platforms and portals, in invitations and mailings.

Each source is connected separately and only where the company has a legal basis to receive the data: public publication, platform accreditation, or access granted by the customer. From the connected sources, the assistant compiles not a link but a procedure card: the procurement subject, customer, deadlines, starting price, participant requirements, and the documentation package with attached files.

Next, a filter applies the company profile: industry, budget range, preparation time, qualifications and licenses, acceptable risk. Rejected procedures do not disappear - you can see which rule filtered them out, and the rule can be adjusted without rewriting the process.

Connecting each new platform is separate work: platforms have different export formats, different access requirements, and different documentation completeness. That is why the pilot starts with one or two sources that provide the main flow, and the rest are added after selection is already working for them.