Solutions

Support and deconsolidation of 1C for mid-market and enterprise

Eliminate monolithic 1C: standard core, microservices, and ESB. One-click updates without specialist dependency.

Our clients

Clients and partners

Capital Group
FSK Group
SMLT
Tochno
Dogma
Sber City
FM Logistic
Danone
Relief Center
Pandora
Support and deconsolidation of 1C for mid-market and enterprise
Saint-Gobain
Askona
FIX PRICE
Snezhnaia Koroleva
Muztorg
TVOE
Greenway
Polaris
Campari
Yandex
Lenta
International perfume and cosmetics brand
Support and deconsolidation of 1C for mid-market and enterprise
RAEC
EKF
L'Etoile
Inventive Retail Group

1C support, maintenance, and integration without pain

If your 1C has become a monolith—constant database, format, and exchange errors, heavy updates where you're afraid something will break, and your business depends on one 1C specialist who holds all the logic in their head—this can be fixed without rewriting from scratch. KT.Team de-monolithizes custom configurations for mid-market and enterprise companies in three steps: refactor to standard 1C, extract customizations into separate services, and connect systems via ESB with loose coupling.

Result: one-click updates, localized customizations, independence from a specific team, and positive ROI instead of maintenance costs for the old system. Our staff includes 110+ specialists; we have 30+ integration projects behind us; a unified API has connected 200+ 1C:Retail systems.

110+specialists on staff
50+mid-market and enterprise customers
30+integration projects
13years of experience

Before and after: 1C de-monolithization architecture

Before: 1C monolith Result: standard 1C + microservices + ESB 1C monolith: customizations + exchanges logic + reports CRM Website Marketplace Warehouse Bank failures · data loss · single point of failure 1C: standard edition updateable core Microservices custom logic ESB loose coupling CRM Website Marketplace Warehouse Bank one-click updates · guaranteed delivery · error handling on the fly
Monolithic 1C connects via point-to-point integrations—every update risks system failure. After demonolithization, the core remains standard, customizations live in separate microservices, and all exchanges route through an ESB bus with loose coupling.

1C Demonolithization Results

Result: standard 1C + microservices + ESB

  • One-click automatic updates with minimal process risk
  • Any IT staff can support the system—staff turnover doesn't break 1C
  • Customizations are isolated in separate services and don't impact adjacent processes.
  • Obsolete functionality is simply disabled along with its service
  • 1C can be deployed to the cloud without maintaining own servers

Before: custom monolithic 1C

  • Manual updates with risk of breaking everything
  • All logic in one specialist's head—risk: 'what if they leave?'
  • Every customization risks breaking working processes
  • The more customizations, the more errors
  • Forgotten customizations keep consuming resources and generating errors
  • Requires dedicated servers and support to keep 1C running

Map out your integration landscape

How we de-monolithize 1C in three steps

  1. 01

    Convert customizations to standard 1C

    We decompose the logic implemented in custom configuration and restore the system to standard 1C.

  2. 02

    Extract custom logic into services

    Required customizations move to separate microservices; obsolete ones are disabled. The 1C core remains standard and updateable.

  3. 03

    Optimize integrations via ESB

    System exchanges are routed through the enterprise bus with loose coupling—no data loss, no additional overhead.

What ESB Layer Brings to 1C

Cases

Case studies: 1C support and de-monolithization

Read all

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions: 1C Support and Demonolithization

How do 1C updates work after de-monolithization?

After standardization, the 1C core updates smoothly with a single click. Customizations live in separate microservices independent of the core structure, so new 1C releases don't break integrations or business logic.

What stages and timelines make up the project?

We start with a configuration audit and integration map, then decompose implemented logic, move it into microservices, and transition exchanges to the ESB bus. Timeline depends on customization scope and number of systems; we work iteratively, not via big bang migration.

What are the project risks and how do you mitigate them?

We take reversible steps: first a pilot flow on a separate circuit, then expansion. We isolate customizations in services, validate exchanges on the bus with guaranteed delivery, so the transition doesn't stop your business.

How does this differ from basic 1C integration with marketplaces or CRM?

Integration connects 1C to external systems; de-monolithization changes 1C's architecture itself so updates and customizations stop being a risk. Specific scenarios—on dedicated pages 1C marketplace integration, 1C marketplaces and 1C systems and services integration.

What alternatives exist for departing Western ESBs?

For CIS ESBs with REST integration to 1C, we use DATAREON; in an electrical equipment manufacturer project (EKF), we compared four ESBs—DATAREON, Mule, Talend, and WSO2—and chose Mule for the target architecture. We select tools based on the circuit: ESB Services and 1C integration via ESB.

Free consultation

Audit your 1C and provide a plan

We'll define the problem scope, assemble the solution and tools, and provide a plan and next steps. Implementation can be done with us, another integrator, or your own team.

  • problem boundaries
  • solution and tools
  • plan and first steps
Discuss your problem

Discuss the solution: 1C Support and Demonolithization for…

Send via: