Systems and owners
We record data sources and consumers, process owners, the criticality of environments and the points where the business is already losing speed.
Architectural integration diagnostics instead of a formula
We replaced the old estimate based on the number of systems and flows with an analysis of architecture, data, risks and business impact.
Project estimation
First we analyze the architecture, then we name a realistic scope of work
Data flows
We break down events, API, files, queues, ETL and manual exports: what should run synchronously and what can be moved to asynchronous exchange.
Reliability and SLA
We check fault tolerance, redelivery, monitoring, logging and recovery scenarios after failures.
Security
We separately review access rights, personal data, action auditing, network boundaries and information security requirements for the integration environment.
Cost of changes
We evaluate not only the development of the first release, but also support, growth, the cost of errors and vendor dependency.
Business impact
We link architectural decisions to metrics: request processing time, product time-to-market, data quality and reduction of manual labor.
What the team gets
The diagnostics outcome can be discussed with business, IT and procurement
Integration map
Which systems are connected, where there are duplicates, manual operations, hidden dependencies and risk zones.
Architectural option
What is best to use: ESB, a message broker, ETL, DWH, API gateway, direct exchange or a combination of approaches.
Work plan
Release sequence, team composition, dependencies on internal specialists and result checkpoints.
Contacts
