Mis-picks and losses
Goods are not where they are recorded, and shortages only surface during inventory counts.
KT.Team is not a boxed WMS vendor. We implement, customize, and integrate your warehouse system with your processes, 1C, and IT landscape. We select the system for the task, own the business outcome, and reduce IT spend.
Our clients
When needed
Goods are not where they are recorded, and shortages only surface during inventory counts.
Without location-based storage, the picker relies on memory, and orders are assembled slowly and with errors.
A mismatch between actual and recorded stock leads to returns, incorrect balances on the website and marketplaces, and penalties.
WMS needs to be replaced without losing customizations and integrations.
The system is unstable, expensive to maintain, does not scale, and enhancements take months.
The warehouse is running, but there are no dashboards or KPIs, so bottlenecks are unclear.
Architecture
From receiving to shipping
Warehouse
WMS
Integrations
Approach
We select a suitable WMS from the CIS software registry, including 1C-based solutions, or adapt your current one. We do not sell our own.
Project metrics are picking speed, stock accuracy, and costs, not the fact that licenses were installed.
WMS works together with 1C, ERP, DWH, and marketplaces through an ESB, so components can change without rewriting the landscape.
A small, strong team and a short TTU instead of a bloated rollout.
Scope of work
System selection for your processes and volumes, warehouse topology design, zone and rule setup, launch, training, and support.
We extend your current system for real-world processes: putaway and picking logic, reports, integrations, and non-standard scenarios.
We migrate project customizations and integrations to a domestic WMS. Emergency MVP or a planned phased migration with minimal downtime.
Location-based topology, putaway and picking rules, handheld terminal workflows, faster picking, and fewer packing errors.
Setup for FBS/FBO, inventory synchronization with marketplaces (WB, Ozon), returns handling, and traceability for Chestny Znak.
DWH-based dashboards and KPI: zone utilization, shift productivity, bottlenecks, and stock accuracy.
Platforms
We don't sell our own WMS — we select a system tailored to your warehouse, processes, budget and existing IT landscape, not for vendor lock-in. Three implementations KT.Team works with in practice.
| Environment | Platforms | When we choose it | KT.Team's role |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1C suite | 1C:WMS Logistics. Warehouse Management (on 1C:Enterprise 8) Bin location in 1C:ERP, 1C:UT, 1C:UNF | You already have 1C, and the warehouse should operate in a unified configuration and ledger, not as a separate silo | We implement, configure storage zones and picking rules, embed into the 1C landscape |
| Commercial solutions (CIS and global) | Solvo.WMS, LEAD WMS (LogistiX), Logistics Vision Suite (Ant Technologies) — from CIS software registry From global solutions — Manhattan Active WM | Large or high-throughput warehouse requiring a mature platform; global solution — for international operations or existing licenses | We implement, customize for your processes, integrate with 1C and the rest of the landscape via ESB/messaging bus |
| Open-source | Odoo Inventory, OpenBoxes, myWMS (Fraunhofer IML, GPL) | Pilot, small warehouse, or limited budget — with readiness to customize; lower maturity and feature depth than packaged WMS | We deploy, customize for your processes, integrate with 1C; as volume grows, we prepare migration to industrial-grade WMS |
Impact
These are market benchmarks, not a KT promise. The exact result depends on the warehouse and starting point, and we define measurable goals at project kickoff for your case.
Lower warehouse operating costs.
Location-based storage and handheld terminals eliminate manual searching.
Faster receiving, putaway, and picking.
End-to-end data between WMS and 1C.
Integration
End-to-end stock balances, documents, and orders between WMS and 1C.
We connect WMS to your landscape through an ESB, not with point-to-point workarounds.
Export warehouse data to a data warehouse for dashboards and KPI.
Inventory and order synchronization for FBS/FBO.
Mobile data capture, transport, mandatory traceability, and labeling.
Import substitution
WMS from the Unified Register of CIS Software; solutions on the 1C platform are domestic by default.
We reproduce the departed system's customizations and integrations, so migration is effectively a new implementation.
We handle registry compliance as a requirements checklist, not as a product called a “registry.”
Still choosing a WMS?
If WMS is not yet selected, start with WMS-readiness: warehouse process, data and integration audit, vendor comparison scenarios, pilot plan and TCO assessment — before RFQ
FAQ
No. KT.Team is an integrator, not a boxed WMS vendor. We select a system for the task from the CIS software registry or adapt the one already installed. Our priority is business results, not selling licenses for a single platform.
Starting with WMS readiness assessment: we document processes, data and integrations, prepare working scenarios for vendor comparison, pilot plan and TCO estimate. So your system choice is based on your workflows, not feature checklists.
Yes, this is one of the main use cases. We extend the system to fit your processes: putaway and picking algorithms, reports, integrations with 1C and marketplaces.
Based on urgency, we choose the right scenario: an emergency MVP on a domestic WMS or a planned phased migration with transfer of customizations and integrations.
Through bus-level integration: end-to-end stock, orders, and documents between WMS and 1C (ERP, trade management, accounting). WMS ↔ 1C integration is our core expertise.
Yes. We configure fulfillment for FBS/FBO, synchronize stock with WB and Ozon, handle returns, and support traceability for Chestny Znak.
Yes. We select a system from the CIS software registry; 1C-platform solutions are CIS by default. We document compliance as a verifiable checklist.
Cases