Selecting and monitoring a property management company - review, tender, and SLA

A digital system for selecting and monitoring property management companies: legal review, comparison of external and in-house companies, online tendering, SLA, and BI analytics.

Our clients

Clients and partners

Capital Group
FSK Group
SMLT
Tochno
Dogma
Sber City
FM Logistic
Danone
+10clients · View cases →

The system helps the developer legally assess and choose a property manager: compare third-party and in-house managers, run an online tender, verify areas of responsibility, and monitor SLA performance through BI and CRM. Legal review, tendering, and SLA monitoring in one environment

Why digital control of management companies improves service quality in new developments

  1. Criteria for selecting a property management company

  2. The system assesses the legal compliance of the management company, licenses, court cases, debts, experience servicing residential buildings, and financial stability.

  3. Comparing external and in-house management companies BI compares SLA metrics, rates, profitability, and resident feedback.

  4. The legal team can see differences in contracts and liability terms.

  5. The selection process takes place online: management companies submit documents through a personal account, the system evaluates them against a criteria checklist, and BI generates a ranking of participants.

  6. The system monitors SLA parameters: response times, cleaning quality, and request fulfillment.

  7. All areas of responsibility are fixed in the contract and displayed in BI.

Assess where AI can deliver impact in your process

Efficiency and growth in one solution

  1. We are building a digital platform where property managers undergo legal review, are evaluated against transparent criteria, take part in electronic tenders, and have their obligations tracked through BI. The solution includes:

  2. Automating legal due diligence and verification of management companies under Federal Law No. 214-FZ and the Housing Code of the CIS.

  3. Comparing external and in-house management companies by KPI and SLA.

  4. Running digital tenders and competitive procurement processes. Business outcome:

  5. Selecting a management company based on objective legal and financial criteria.

  6. A transparent competitive process and SLA compliance monitoring.

  7. Reducing a developer's operational and reputational risks. Solutions without unnecessary complexity, from idea and analysis to results

We will study your processes and propose a ready-to-use implementation plan

We consult We discuss goals and tasks, define priorities, and set expected outcomes for the joint work

We analyze your processes We study current processes and approaches, identify growth points, and determine which solution will deliver tangible results

We plan the solution rollout We discuss goals and tasks, define priorities, and set expected outcomes for the joint work

Launch and support We implement the solution, train your team and provide support so the solution delivers tangible value

How automation reduces costs and improves service quality

Automating the selection and monitoring of property management companies enables a developer to manage property operations with data, not intuition. 70% less time spent evaluating and approving management company contracts 90% transparency in tenders and selection criteria 60% fewer complaints after project launch 3x faster SLA analysis and compliance monitoring Customer reviews

Discuss: Selecting and monitoring a property management company...

Send via: