Choose one of 13 accounting processes for the AI agent pilot

For each scenario, we document inputs, rules, exceptions, and the accountant review point. A typical process takes 1-2 weeks and costs 300,000 RUB; the exact price is set after analysis, and payment is due after acceptance.

Starting map

13 processes come together in one control loop

The agent gathers data, checks rules, and prepares an action. The accountant handles the exception and confirms the entry in 1C.

AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases
01

Source documents

Documents, VAT, reconciliation statements, and purchase and sales ledgers.

02

Bank

Statements, obligations, payment register, and payment schedule.

03

Control

Month-end closing, intercompany transactions, accounts receivable, and financial reporting.

04

Pilot

One process, clear boundaries, real data, and acceptance agreed in advance.

Our clients

Clients and partners

Capital Group
FSK Group
SMLT
Tochno
Dogma
Sber City
FM Logistic
Danone
Relief Center
Pandora
AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases
Saint-Gobain
Askona
FIX PRICE
Snezhnaia Koroleva
Muztorg
TVOE
Greenway
Polaris
Campari
Yandex
Lenta
International perfume and cosmetics brand
AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases
RAEC
EKF
L'Etoile
Inventive Retail Group

13 processes we recommend starting with

  1. This is a catalog of candidates for a limited pilot.

  2. The exact scope depends on systems, data quality, the number of variations, and control rules.

  3. For a first rollout, source documents, bank statements, and reconciliation statements are usually the best fit: they have repeatable input, a verifiable outcome, and a clear exception queue.

  4. The full product scope is described on the page AI assistant for accountants.

Source documents

01

Document recognition and posting

Suitable for a repeatable flow from EDI, email, or scans. In the pilot, we check recognition, matching to the counterparty, and preparation of a draft or an exception.

02

Reconciliation statements

Suitable if statements are regularly requested and compared manually. In the pilot, we define the workflow for generating, receiving, and explaining discrepancies.

03

VAT risk and gap control

Suitable when the list of checks is agreed. In the pilot, we collect transactions with risk indicators into a register with the reason and owner.

04

Reviewing input VAT for deduction

Suitable if the deduction criteria can be formalized. In the pilot, we check documents against agreed fields and conditions, and send disputed cases to the accountant.

05

Reconciliation of the purchase ledger and sales ledger

Suitable when exports are available and matching rules are clear. In the pilot, we identify discrepancies and create a review queue before the return is prepared.

Bank and treasury

06

Importing and posting bank statements

Suitable for stable statement formats and posting rules. In the pilot, we load an agreed set of banks, prepare matches, and move unidentified and partial payments into a register.

07

Accounts payable control

Suitable if deadlines, limits, and document completeness are available in the accounting system. In the pilot, we produce a verifiable list of deviations.

08

Preparing and approving the payment register

Suitable when an approval workflow is in place. In the pilot, we collect requests, check the supporting basis, and prepare a register for approval by the responsible parties.

09

Payment calendar creation

Suitable when scheduled payments and balances are available. In the pilot, we schedule payments by date and priority and highlight possible cash gaps.

Control and analytics

10

Month-end closing

Suitable for one limited close-related area with dependencies that can be formalized. In the pilot, we track statuses and surface errors to the responsible person.

11

Intercompany turnover control

Suitable when companies have unified identifiers and matching rules. In the pilot, we find pairs and send discrepancies for review before consolidation.

12

Accounts receivable control

Suitable when due dates, amounts, and owners are available. In the pilot, we segment overdue items and prepare approvable reminders; complex cases are handed off to staff.

13

Management financial summary creation

Suitable when the sources and breakdowns are agreed. In the pilot, we build one recurring summary for the selected metrics and show deviations together with the sources.

How the control loop works

Document travels from source to verified action

Sources

Email / SBISSource document
1Ccounterparty, contract, accounting

AI agent

Extracts fieldsamount, VAT, details
Verifies rulessource is visible

Control

AccountantConfirm, correct, reject

Action

Draft in 1Cwithout standalone posting

Next

Activity logdocument, rule, decision
  • normal ready for approval
  • warning exception queue
Illustrative diagram: system and rule components are clarified for the selected process.
1 processwe start with one repeatable accounting area with measurable input and output
1C, EDI, emailwork with the current systems and channels where documents and statuses already live
human oversightAI prepares the data, compares it, and highlights exceptions; critical decisions remain with the responsible person

Offer

We launch a pilot for one accounting process

Guideline - 300,000 RUB excluding VAT

In 1-2 weeks, we build and validate one typical bounded workflow on the client's data: for example, source documents outside EDI, reconciliation statements, bank statements, a payment schedule, or a recurring report. The exact price is fixed after reviewing inputs, outputs, and integrations; payment is due after acceptance.

  • 1 selected process
  • guideline 1-2 weeks
  • guideline 300,000 RUB excluding VAT
  • Scope and acceptance criteria are fixed before kickoff
Discuss the process

Pilot scope and acceptance

Inputs

We document the sources, document types, examples of standard cases and exceptions, and access to the agreed test environment.

Output

We define one verifiable action: a draft in 1C, a discrepancy register, a prepared statement, a payment calendar, or a recurring summary.

Client participation

You need a process owner, an accountant to validate the rules, access to examples, and agreed timelines for feedback on exceptions.

Acceptance

Before building, we measure current manual steps and time, then agree on the target metric. The pilot is accepted when the defined scenarios work on the client's data and exceptions are sent to the responsible person with a clear reason.

What problem is solved

  1. In many companies, accounting already uses 1C, EDI, online banking, and Excel.

  2. Manual work remains between these systems: some counterparties send documents by email, reconciliation statements must be requested and tracked, period-close statuses are kept in email threads, and reports require regular rework.

  3. When there are dozens or hundreds of such operations, they turn into separate hidden processes.

  4. People download files, open emails, transfer data, remind counterparties, reconcile amounts, and manually track responses.

Document flowAgent preparesChecks and controlAccountant approvesSmooth month-end close

Standard processing: agent prepares, accountant confirms

Accountant

Review UPD and prepare receipt in 1C

Example: UPD no. 184

Interface concept
Counterparty
Example: LLC
Amount
120 000 ₽
VAT
20 %
Contract
Delivery / 2026

Agent checked

Document is reconciled with counterparty record and contract. No critical discrepancies found.

  • Company detailsTax ID and registration code match 1C
  • Amount and VATdocument balances
  • Contractactive as of document date

Suggested action

Create receipt draft in 1C

After confirmation: 1C · operation draft

Trace: UPD + counterparty record + check rule

FixConfirm

Source documents

Document follows a clear path

Incoming document is verified against 1C rules; exceptions go to Foundation and remain under accountant control.

AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases 01

The document came from EDI

An incoming UTD triggers a 1C rule check without manual re-entry.

AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases 02

Standard path or exception

A standard document is created in 1C, and a nonstandard one is passed to Osnova.

AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases 03

Templates for nonstandard documents

Real anonymized screen: the document type is linked to 1C and an export template.

AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases 04

Suspicious document to Telegram

The bot warns about an unregistered sender and lets the user open the register or leave the document in quarantine.

Best suited for

A pilot is a good fit if the process has a repeatable flow, a client-side owner, access to source data, and a verifiable output. The accountant must be ready to confirm the rules and handle exceptions. Company size is secondary: what matters is enough volume of similar operations to measure the current workload and compare results after launch.

Exception: the agent explains the discrepancy

Accountant

Why isn't the document ready to post?

Example: act no. 57

Interface concept
Amount in act
246 000 ₽
Amount in 1C
240 000 ₽
Discrepancy
+6 000 ₽
Source
line 4 / services

Agent checked

Service amount on line 4 differs from 1C order. Automatic posting stopped

  • CounterpartyMatches
  • Orderfound in 1C
  • Amountdiscrepancy 6,000 ₽

Suggested action

Request amount confirmation or correct line 4

After confirmation: exception queue · awaits accountant

Trace: act + 1C order + amount reconciliation rule

Correct dataApprove exception

Reconciliation statements

Reconciliation ends with a verifiable decision

Agent collects sources, explains the discrepancy, obtains confirmation, and records transmission via EDI and entry in 1C.

AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases 01

Reconciliation statement request received

A request for a reporting period becomes a data collection task.

AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases 02

Agents gather sources

1C, Diadoc, Astral, and the bank are combined in one register with the status of each source.

AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases 03

Discrepancy explained to the accountant

The system matches two ledgers, shows the source of the difference, and leaves confirmation for the chief accountant.

AI Automation for Accounting Processes: 13 Use Cases 04

Approved, sent, registered

A single screen records approval in Telegram, sending through EDI, and registration in 1C.

How the first project works

  1. 01

    Choose one process

    If a quick review shows that it actually contains three different processes, we reduce the scope honestly and define the first part.

  2. 02

    Map the current workflow

    We document the files, systems, roles, manual operations, expectations, common errors, and the checks that must stay with the person.

  3. 03

    Build a working solution

    This can be an integration with 1C, incoming email processing, document recognition, a status traffic light, act comparison, preparation of an upload file, or an exception review interface.

  4. 04

    Test it on a live process

    We look at how much manual work was eliminated, which exceptions remain, and which rules need clarification before the next process.

What the client gets

A newly working process

An accounting work area with reduced manual entry, status tracking, and a clear exception queue.

Reduce manual work

The metric for the first project is how much time and how many manual operations are removed from the process. Headcount savings appear cumulatively once there are several such automated processes.

Accountant review

AI does not make critical accounting decisions on its own. It prepares the data, compares it, highlights discrepancies, and passes clear exceptions to the person.

A foundation for the next processes

After the first successful area, it is easier to take on the next one: the data structure, access, rules, and confidence in the approach are already in place.

Where we use AI and where we do not

AI is useful

  • recognize details, amount, VAT, and document type
  • classify an incoming document or email
  • find a mismatch between statements, payments, or invoices
  • prepare a draft reply to a counterparty
  • compile a brief process status and highlight exceptions

AI should not

  • invent journal entries or accounting rules
  • promise close timelines without a responsible person
  • send critical communication independently
  • change data in 1C without traceable control
  • replace the accountant in disputed and regulated decisions

Working format

The starting format is one process, a short review before kickoff, and fixed outcome boundaries. At the start, we agree on access, examples, rules, and feedback timelines. We measure the result by reducing manual work in the selected process: the number of manual operations, processing time, the share of exceptions, and the time needed to prepare a recurring report. Fixed-price terms are described in pricing basics.

Select an accounting process for the pilot

When not to start

A broad request to automate the entire accounting function requires a separate change program and goes beyond the scope of the initial pilot. We postpone the pilot if there is no client-side owner, no access to source data, no repeatable flow, or no accountant ready to review the result. These organizational constraints must be removed first.

First step

Break down one accounting process in 30 minutes

30 minutes

Choose one pain point: source documents outside EDI, reconciliation statements, a report, statements, a payment calendar, or another repeatable process. In the first call, we assess manual work, data, the process owner, and the measurable result of the first project.

  • Is there repeatable manual work
  • Which data and systems are involved
  • Who owns the process on the client side
  • What result can be checked first
Discuss the process

Cases

AI implementation cases

Read all

Discuss: Choose one of 13 accounting processes for...

Send via: